Am I the only one?

Objeqt objegt objeg

A partial objeqct is precisely that: an object of preferential treatment which expresses itself as an instance of partiality. If it constitutes itself as a matter of expression, it is the expression of a partial drive, where the drive, drift, is both an endless movement,, and always already moved. 

[this is expressed in the ordeal of the space simulator? 

The course of the drive: first drive is initiated in being  hauled—the source of the drive  is indeterminative, and as the history if the drive is traced to its source, we see it passed through the various iterations by which this source is at the same time historically determined and contingent on various chance fantasms.

We Death can’t be symbolised. But insofar as it must be,  — it is the only thing that is assured, due respects to the sure things— it can be marked only after the fact.  It is even after the fact before the event has come to pass. Consider the circumspect orbit I have to face everyday—am I not, at a certain point, a point that in its overt signs is undeniably that of a dead man walking?

Consider the case of a man who contracts a fatal infection for which there is no cure.  The moment of contraction  he’s  “a dead man” , his life becomes cone-shaped, an expendable essence surrounds him on all sides 

he an essentially expendable blip on conscience’s radar, all insofar as compared to the others (thems yet to decipher the sign strewn over birth as death’s advance warning) he’s  “dead already” , and dead for these very same others. Within inches of my life, far-sighted pervert, I wouldn’t be able to see shit!    It is not something one can ever “catch in time”, for 

Being the limit of time, time’s coming to term, death’s pretty much the timeliest time there is

What has two thumbs and guaranteed wouldnt be able to see shit?

Diddlee

death is something which always passes outside of time, though it may happen in time.

Consider Samarkand

deployed toward a starting over. But this starting over is 

This could be expressed in the following way: that the definitions or the ‘edge’ of the partial object — cannot be established by tracing its contour in order to approximate where the object ends and what is not the partial object begins. Rather the “extent” of the part object is definable as a pure emphatic impression of partiality that is linked telepathically (what I have referred to elsewhere as the venereal diagramism) with a corresponsive instance of an impressionable body that we are prone to call a subject. 

a kind of body mass index of auto-plasticity instantly accounts for the pure partiality of a partial object is an object whose— the distinct impression it makes upon a sensorial apparatus (its perceptive index) — when brought into relief reveal an assemblage  can be traced to 

which entrances through  expression of a partiality

Let us define the statement of a partial object as what it indicates of the condition of its alliance with a non-decomposable attribute.

The partial object is an expression of a being partial to ‘x’ — Not an immutable partiality ’for’ or ‘against’ such and such a thing

a partial being for

a being partial for

Questions

The object is partial, we say, a part, but with respect to what — if any — global totality is it a “mere” part ? 

Partial to what?

In the notion of partial object there is present the supposed desire, displaced onto the part object which henceforth acts as a subtitute, for a totality. But in what direction does this operate. Does a grown attracted to breasts because they act as a fitting substitute for what he really loves, which is his mother? Or could it be that the love for his mother -- in the form of her person, company etc -- is but the substitute, the representation, of something else he really wants and knows her to be able to dispense insofar as it has always been through the funnel which he grafts onto her body that he has been able to extract what he desires. What does desire signify here?

Let us look at the matter more closely: Lacan describes the maternal body as a kind of reservoir, but the child must bring his own tool to siphon off from her what he craves so relentlessly. 

There is no direct access to this substance, and as such the mother is both the means and the obstacle to . He must prevail on her for satisfaction: the earth freely provides him with what he needs, but what he craves requires him to dig, to drill, to climb, to excavate... Yes, some apple trees need to be given a shake to loosen the fruit from its branches. 

The impressions of partiality  only weds itself to an impressionable body

Not have any existence independent of the impressionable substance

We can disti guish between the partiality of the part object and the partiality of the part subject. 

Partial

With whom or what am I communing when I consult the order of partial objects?

The world of the partial object  and its corresponsive “earth” , surject (tilde) or impressionable substance can be defined  much in the same way that a partially ordered set can: ordered by a transitive, antisymmetric, and reflexive binary relation

 it is defined as the inverse of a surjective function whereby the host domain 

In fact tge cogency of a partial string is simply its capacity to instate a gross medium in which the partiality of the subject (no longer as codomain of i(a) and I(A)) substance can be asserted and set “flush” against a freshly impressionable object.

The dominance of a partial substance of the subject can be reasserted   

Firstly sirens was a programmatic of reverse engineering impressionable substance. Its genius was to suspend

And offsetting abstract contetive media with 

Yheres a careful scaling of facial and digital traits such  that a hierarchy  comes to pronounce itself as bearing the mark of a new age. The two signs adorning the pathway into the new age—hear ye: “watch your step and evermore… is it alloweddownhill from hier” reads in good faith, as though it were an exclusive dispatch of hospitable concern for the welfare of the other, and in particular for these travellers who—weary from walking a long and labored path— are naturally very glad to hear it. For it offers itself to travellers not merely as an signpost affixed to a local segment of the landscape  as an object to be taken along for the inhabitation of what is to come, hand luggage, whose concernful addendum is as pragmatic as it is a purely gratuitous or otherwise incidental courtesy be placed in the pocket ofvisitors to mind their step as, emerging from an entriely vertical transportational dilemma,  they renegotiate their relation to the  curvature of the earth as well as to their own bodies destabilising  transition to a friendlier nomadic incline continue forth into the grandiloquent epoch, as it does inform those entering and who are invariably glad upon hearing the news, that from this point on the endurance game will be but a memory. (“it’s all down-hill from here”) is a welcome sign (substantative a-diction gets better with age )is array of mediatic extractions remarks:

Remarks on the essence of the subject as composed within the form of what is given as I(A), though this is propoed up on a  ...

There being no representable form of the I(A)  or iterative set of Othernesses with the exception, that is,  of the latter’s becoming staged in what is essentially memory. This  mnemic catalogue of re-membered idealichs — expressed through an ideal politics of local government — with its elected officials, its biases, as well as the role of legislation as it is practiced by entriely mindless automata  — the ideational representatives who appear in view suddenly to influence an action, at a street corner say, . where we are given what could be called the always findable form of an e-lative imagence 

A non-surjective function from domain X to codomain Y. The smaller yellow oval inside Y is the image (also called range) of f. 

 / syʁʒɛktif /

---

What Are Functions in Mathematics?

A function is a relation between a set of inputs and a set of permissible outputs with the property that each input is related to exactly one output. Let A & B be any two non-empty sets; mapping from A to B will be a function only when every element in set A has one end and only one image in set B.

Example:

Another definition of functions is that it is a relation “f” in which each element of set “A” is mapped with only one element belonging to set “B”. Also, in a function, there can’t be two pairs with the same first element.

I find this wording curious: that in a function there can't be two pairs with the same first element.

What is meant by this, and what I hear in it will perhaps be at odds. I don't see two pairs. I see the numbers 1, 2 and 3 in one set, and the letter P, Q and R in another. In set A, 1 and 2 both map to P. Let me say that P, and not 1, will designate first place in a place, Q second, R third, while 1, 2 and 3 will designate the athletes. In this race, there are two athletes that have apparantly come in first. In order to satisfy the rule that there can't be two pairs with the same first element, two pairs cannot exist with the element of firstness in the same race.

If you dont get something you want, it could be because your worldvieoooooiw is wrong.

Things in a certain domain do not align with reality

"I dont think of that when I odnt get what I want--about by worldview. I think about what I'm doing or not doing.

worldview mismatched to reality

Can we formulate the ideal ego as a basic input-output, in which is placed the object, (a), and out of which an image emerges?

f(a) = i

1 R

2 S

3  I

Lacan’s matheme states the matter like this i(a). Mapped to the function, i - the image - would represent the f of the function. i.e:

f(x)

i(a)

And thus

f(x) = y

i(a) = ?

What if ‘f’ here designates the function of the fantasm

RGLEXS

Expression

Literal

Alternation

Sequence

Repetition

‘Raining’

Exp1, exp2

Repeat

Alternation (a)

Alt1, alt2

Sequence (a)

Repetition (a)

Literal (a)

‘dogs’ , ‘cats’

Represents the refular expression 

raining & (dogs | cats) *

INTERPRET takes as an argument the context in which to interpret the expression. The context contains the input string and information on how much of it has been matched so far. Each subclass of RegularExpression implements Interpret to match the next part of the input string based on the current context.

Tertiary subjects, or when a man throws away his School

Man has become a School: what we will call a living finite state machine (an fsm), (or what so and so variously calls a simple idealized machine ,  what we will call sim for short) — whose function works in trying to ‘recognise patterns within input taken from one or other character set ( an ALPHABET ), C .’ Here,  

“Along this path, and by promoting set theory, I've been trying this year to suggest to those who hold the function of analyst that they should become versed, in order to train themselves, in this vein that exploits these statements that are formalized in logic. To train themselves in what? In the fact that there has to be a sifting apart of what earlier I called the filling in, the interval, the buffering, the gap, that lies between the body, jouissance, semblance, and discourse.

This needs to be distinguished in order to realize that this is where the question is posed regarding something else, which is neither fine sentiment nor jurisprudence, and which bears a name, that of interpretation.

”Hi X, might you have a spare five minutes for a chat tomorrow afternoon or evening?  If not a good time let me know when would suit you.

Kind regards,

Alex

by which the simulation (and this is my argument  re the function of the School),, functions to accept or reject an input depending on whether the pattern defined by the SKOOL occurs in the input. 

We will write this binary accept-reject protocol of the SKOOL-LOOKS    

f Δ η ( k ) ∫ (ə) n    insofar as a subject now  constitues itself as the thrown class as the living matriculation that subsists as the  reification of this model:

fan (konstant) shun

fade (constant)  zen

fake [faek]

Let us consider3

“At the time, Freud was tackling the thorny problem of the compulsion to repeat in traumatic neurosis, and this digression into normal childhood experience was in fact meant to help contextualize the question. Ernst was a "good little boy," manifested no particular symptoms, was rather calm by disposition, and "never cried when his mother left him for a few hours." 

But he "had an occasional disturbing habit of taking any small objects he could get hold of and throwing them away from him into a corner, under the bed. . . . As he did this he gave vent to a loud, long-drawn-out 'o-o-o-o,' accompanied by an expression of interest and satisfaction.”

It throws the subject under another es

So we have three distinct instances — but instances of what precisely? Three i stances  of jacere, of THROWING, thrownness into the world and into language being course  one the ….. features of existential Da-sein. Dasein, which literally means “being-there”, becomes awar

Freud invented Psychoanalysis, let us say, twice

on two occasions

Ours is an emphatic medium. When Oscar Zentner ‘grunted’ at me, was this perhaps what the founder of this School was emphasizing — if not for me, then for whom? or what…

It recently struck me as odd—

—indeed, if it struck me, not as something merely strange, but rather as “odd”, that as concerns the three core founding acts — Freud’s invention of that which was nevertheless a discovery, Lacan’s discovery of that which in the invention, it remains a point to be ever re-emphasised, not withstanding the of a requisite collective presence of collaborators, as concerns the funding fatherscould it be 

Transference is not what we think

In signal processing, sampling is the reduction of a continuous-time signal to a discrete-time signal.

concernful dwellings  ≈

“when an inner situation is not made conscious, it happens outside, as Fate”

 m

 search box this is different too before the thinner keus

so  said the fricery store bang crash smash hence the fuiitar  \

was stauing opento that which was required to unsheath a wwomans coaws. -  as ine woman pits it to scratch andd claw thosinstance of  insistence of a man 

y

Mothibg can stop the incessant sliding of signification;

Castration seems disposed to this end, to an end to the sliding

To acceed to castration seems to mean to acceed to the signification of sex, to ingratiated sexual reality as the final signification, 

Sexual difference: not as an irreducible anatomical reality, but as a finate state of the machine

Castration enables a view from the other side 

Meaning of  interpretation: 1: to procure/activate an additional signifier for the analysand

Impasse obstacle boundary to be worked

An additional signifier: baudrillard, in the sumbolic order, sex is an extra, something annexed on, additional. 

This doesnt mean nexessarily that all extra or additional signifiers are sexual, but which of the additional signifiers are activated in analysis typically?

Is it not the sexual signifier, the activation of a signifier that furbishes a sexual meaning to the patients speech? 

What is sexuality qua meaning?

Did #object #heresy #hoard

—/—/

It occurs to us suddenly to question the prototypical enframing of subject matters as noncommunicating drives and to ask instead whether these apparebtly autonomous assemblages orchestrated around their peculiar aims and organised by their peculiar objects could be brought into a conspiratorial matrix, no longer of competing assemblages for the channeling of desire—each more or less disposed toward the latter’s repression—but additionally rather for the establishment if splinter cells, minor cross-sections of libidinal mutations. Indeed, it is speculative and thus prone to arouse suspicion, but that it could well be an inordinatly sequestered through a blind kind of overemphasis to have as the current to this psychosampling of the minutiae of these fascist ectoctonomies breed passages of finitude where the object would be to maximise the number of intercalating cells of bijjective disiderata. We would be on guard to a minimum degree requisite to decant the effusion of deseing assemblages to ask whether the gross refrain of terminal lamentation—terminal both in the ordinal sense and in the general patholegislative sense—is not a fasist means of routinal typesetting of the asperities of the assemblages transposing the repression of desire into the desire for repression and thus the desire of repression.

Let us consider, for instance, the implications of repression, whose kinship with representation augurs for a polyphemic lateralisation of the words, giving the verb: to repressent

The verb form, in its wider, let’s say basic form, says to represent, its global cacophony or presentifying form, in which it collapses the predicate, performing the very thingk, expressing the planar content of repressing ‘ent’ by collapsing this net terminal entity as predicate within the gross form of the infinitive. An interning of the scope of geometral proportion, introducing depth into the equatorial lampost of earthwrit: to repressent—or not rather.

-ent

/(ə)nt/

suffix

1. 1.
   (forming adjectives) denoting an occurrence of action."refluent"

2. 2.
   (forming nouns) denoting an agent."coefficient"

It is from this that m’etonymologique disperses its modalar forms: for a taxonomy is the product of a tax levied on the grosser form of dualism operationalised in floating infinitives. These which take as their (potential) object every prospective noun as that which it afts upon. To repressent ___ 

To supplement the floating verb form with an alimentary substantitive,  that which we have done with the terminal form of -ent, its S1 and its S2, is in fact to exact a tax producing its net extent. Lacan’s not-All as well as his “every other signifier” that the ent-one is not—every signifier other than ent-first . These sec-ents are the all that attach to the void of the minus-phi.

S1 like S2 comes last in the stacking of the syntagm, but alternate in the same place by which the substantitive would receive its cogency.

S1 (forming adjectives) denoting an occurrence of action."refluent"

S2 (forming nouns) denoting an agent."coefficient"

Thus to suffixiate the syntagm with everything - x  cuts across the curve of the ebtity at two points, producing an agent before the variable matrix.

To suffix with x productions, taxonomy. Race where? At the racewhile in which.

a fluency that flows back on

a numbing agent